Offshore Investing Explained: Choosing Between Direct, Wrapped, and Indirect
- Kobus Kuhn

- Feb 17
- 5 min read
Why Investing Offshore is Crucial for Wealth Preservation and Growth

South African investors face unique challenges when it comes to wealth preservation. The local economy is highly concentrated, with significant exposure to resource-based industries, a volatile currency, and regulatory constraints. Diversifying offshore is no longer just an option—it’s a necessity for high-net-worth individuals looking to protect their wealth, access global opportunities, and optimize tax efficiency.
However, not all offshore investments are created equal. Investors can invest directly offshore, invest via a wrapped structure (such as an offshore endowment), or opt for indirect exposure via local feeder funds. The choice of structure can dramatically impact tax efficiency, estate planning, and liquidity. This article explores the advantages of direct offshore investing with a wrapper compared to other offshore investment structures.
Why Invest Offshore?
Diversification & Reduced Currency RiskInvesting offshore allows you to spread your risk across multiple economies, sectors, and currencies. Given that the South African Rand (ZAR) has depreciated by an average of 5% annually, local investors experience an erosion of purchasing power over time. Investing in hard currencies like USD, GBP, or EUR offers better long-term stability.
Access to Global Growth OpportunitiesMany of the world’s top-performing companies are listed outside South Africa. The US, Europe, and Asia provide access to high-growth industries, such as technology, healthcare, and renewable energy, which are underrepresented in the South African market.
Mitigating Local Economic RisksSouth Africa's economic and political uncertainties make offshore investing essential. By diversifying globally, investors can reduce their dependence on a single economy and safeguard their wealth against local market downturns.
Choosing the Right Offshore Investment Structure
The structure you choose for offshore investing affects tax efficiency, estate planning, and liquidity. Below is a comparison of three main options: Direct Offshore Investing (No Wrapper), Direct Offshore via a Wrapped Structure, and Indirect Offshore Investing (Local Feeder Fund).
Comparison Table: Offshore Investment Structures

The Strategic Advantage of a Wrapped Offshore Investment
While all offshore options provide currency diversification and access to global markets, investing via a wrapped structure (such as an offshore endowment) offers distinct advantages:
Lower Capital Gains Tax
Offshore wrappers fix CGT at 12% for individuals, significantly lower than the 18% CGT applicable to direct offshore investments.
Gains are calculated in the base currency, meaning clients don’t pay excessive tax due to Rand depreciation.
Lower tax on investment
Income in an investment is taxed at a fixed rate of 30% making it attractive to anyone whose marginal tax rate is higher.
Estate Planning & Situs Tax Protection
Direct offshore investors risk losing up to 40% of their offshore assets to foreign estate duties (Situs Tax).
Offshore wrappers eliminate Situs Tax exposure, allowing seamless inheritance and avoiding foreign probate delays.
Optimized Liquidity & Control
Unlike direct offshore investments that require probate in foreign jurisdictions, wrapped structures ensure immediate beneficiary payouts.
Offshore wrappers have a five-year restriction period, allowing one withdrawal and one loan within this time. However, providers structure investments into multiple contracts (100-1000), enabling one withdrawal and one loan per contract, significantly improving liquidity.
Simplified Tax Reporting
With a wrapped offshore investment, the financial institution handles tax calculations and payments, reducing administrative burdens for investors.
Regulatory Considerations: Offshore Transfers & Exchange Control
South African investors transferring funds offshore must comply with SARB regulations:
Single Discretionary Allowance (SDA): Allows individuals to transfer up to R1 million per year offshore without tax clearance.
Foreign Investment Allowance (FIA): Allows individuals to transfer up to R10 million per year, subject to SARS tax clearance.
Asset Swap Mechanism: Some institutions allow offshore investing via asset swaps, which do not require direct foreign currency transfers.
Understanding these rules is essential to ensuring compliance and maximizing offshore investment efficiency.
Conclusion: Offshore Investing is a Must for HNWIs
For high-net-worth investors, offshore investing is not just about seeking higher returns—it’s about risk management, tax efficiency, and long-term wealth preservation. While investing directly offshore offers diversification, doing so without a wrapper exposes investors to excessive tax burdens and estate planning risks. Offshore wrappers provide a strategic advantage, protecting investors from Situs Tax, probate delays, and excessive CGT calculations based on currency movements.
As South African investors continue to navigate local economic uncertainties and currency volatility, offshore investment remains the key to financial security and wealth growth.




Comments